Before shipping a visual redesign of alexander-k-eliot.github.io, we ran it through our own free AI Visibility Checker. The same rubric we hold every site to on the benchmark. It failed six of nine checks. This is the full run, the fixes, and the rerun.
The checker scores a homepage against nine weighted checks. A perfect run needs all nine to pass.
Nothing here changed the visual redesign's content or claims. These are the same six technical checks the free tool runs on any site you paste in.
What this does and doesn't prove. A 100/100 means this page passes all nine technical checks in our rubric: the same conditions that separate the top and bottom of our 20-site SaaS benchmark. It is not a promise that any specific AI assistant will cite this page. Nobody can honestly promise that. It means the real, verifiable groundwork is in place.
The full rubric and methodology are the same ones used across every benchmark we publish, including the one where our own Gumroad storefront scored 45/100 and we said so on the product page.
This case study is one page. Here is everything else it connects to, grouped the same way the homepage is, so nothing is more than one click away.